Categorical variables can't readily be used as predictors in multiple regression analysis. They must be split up into dichotomous variables known as “dummy variables”. This tutorial offers a simple tool for creating them.

- Example Data File
- Prerequisites and Installation
- Example I - Numeric Categorical Variable
- Example II - Categorical String Variable

## Example Data File

We'll demonstrate our tool on 2 examples: a numeric and a string variable. Both variables are in staff.sav, partly shown below.

We encourage you to download and open this data file in SPSS and replicate the examples we'll present.

## Prerequisites and Installation

Our tool requires SPSS version 24 or higher. Also, the SPSS Python 3 essentials must be installed (usually the case with recent SPSS versions).

Next, click SPSS_TUTORIALS_DUMMIFY.spe in order to download our tool. For installing it, navigate to as shown below.

In the dialog that opens, navigate to the downloaded .spe file and install it. SPSS will then confirm that the extension was successfully installed under

## Example I - Numeric Categorical Variable

Let's now dummify Marital Status. Before doing so, we recommend you first inspect its basic frequency distribution as shown below.

Importantly, note that Marital Status contains 4 valid (non missing) values. As we'll explain later on, we always need to exclude one category, known as the reference category. We'll therefore create 3 dummy variables to represent our 4 categories.

We'll do so by navigating to
as shown below.

Let's now fill out the dialog that pops up.

We choose the first category (“Never Married”) as our reference category. Completing these results in the syntax below. Let's run it.

***Create dummy variables for Marital Status with the first category as reference.**

SPSS TUTORIALS DUMMIFY VARIABLES=marit

/OPTIONS NEWLABELS=LABLAB REFCAT=FIRST ACTION=RUN.

## Result

Our tool has now created 3 dummy variables in the active dataset. Let's compare them to the value labels of our original variable, Marital Status.

First note that the **variable names** for our dummy variables are the original variable name plus an integer suffix. These suffixes don't usually correspond to the categories they represent.

Instead, these categories are found in the **variable labels** for our dummy variables. In this example, they are based on the variable and value labels in Marital Status.

Next, note that some categories were skipped for the following reasons:

- no dummy variable was created for “Never Married” because we chose it as our reference category;
- no dummy variable was created for “Currently Divorcing” because it doesn't actually occur in our dataset;
- no dummy variable was created for “(Unknown)” because it is a user missing value.

Now the big question is:
are these results correct?
An easy way to confirm that they are indeed correct is actually running a dummy variable regression. We'll then run the exact same analysis with a basic ANOVA.

For example, let's try and predict Salary from Marital Status via both methods by running the syntax below.

***Compare mean salaries by marital status via dummy variable regression.**

regression

/dependent salary

/method enter marit_1 to marit_3.

***Compare mean salaries by marital status via ANOVA.**

means salary by marit

/statistics anova.

First note that the regression r-square of 0.089 is identical to the eta squared of 0.089 in our ANOVA results. This makes sense because they both indicate the proportion of variance in Salary accounted for by Marital Status.

Also, our ANOVA comes up with a significance level of p = 0.002 just as our regression analysis does. We could even replicate the regression B-coefficients and their confidence intervals via ANOVA (we'll do so in a later tutorial). But for now, let's just conclude that the results are correct.

## Example II - Categorical String Variable

Let's now dummify Job Type, a string variable. Again, we'll start off by inspecting its frequencies and we'll probably want to specify some missing values. As discussed in SPSS - Missing Values for String Variables, doing so is cumbersome but the syntax below does the job.

***Inspect basic frequency table.**

frequencies jtype.

***Change '(Unknown)' into 'NA'.**

recode jtype ( '(Unknown)' = 'NA').

***Set empty string value and 'NA' as user missing values.**

missing values jtype ('','NA').

***Reinspect basic frequency table.**

frequencies jtype.

## Result

Again, we'll first navigate to

and we'll fill in the dialog as shown below.
For string variables, the values themselves usually describe their categories. We therefore throw values (instead of value labels) into the variable labels for our dummy variables.

If we neither want the first nor the last category as reference, we'll select “none”. In this case, we must manually exclude one of these dummy variables from the regression analysis that follows.

Besides creating dummy variables, we may also want to inspect the syntax that's created and run by the tool. We may also copy, paste, edit and run it from a syntax window instead of having our tool do that for us.

Completing these steps result in the syntax below.

***Create dummy variables for Job Type without any reference category.**

SPSS TUTORIALS DUMMIFY VARIABLES=jtype

/OPTIONS NEWLABELS=LABVAL REFCAT=NONE ACTION=BOTH.

## Result

Besides creating 5 dummy variables, our tool also prints the syntax that was used in the output window as shown below.

Finally, if you didn't choose any reference category, you must exclude one of the dummy variables from your regression analysis. The syntax below shows what happens if you don't.

**wrong way**: no reference category.

regression

/dependent salary

/method enter jtype_1 jtype_2 jtype_3 jtype_4 jtype_5.

*Compare salaries by Job Type

**right way**: reference category = 4 (sales).

regression

/dependent salary

/method enter jtype_1 jtype_2 jtype_3 jtype_5.

The first example is a textbook illustration of perfect **multicollinearity**: the score on some predictor can be perfectly predicted from some other predictor(s). This makes sense: a respondent scoring 0 on the first 4 dummies *must* score 1 on the last (and reversely).

In this situation, B-coefficients can't be estimated. Therefore, SPSS excludes a predictor from the analysis as shown below.

Note that tolerance is the proportion of variance in a predictor that can not be accounted for by other predictors in the model. A tolerance of 0.000 thus means that some predictor can be 100% -or perfectly- predicted from the other predictors.

Thanks for reading!

## THIS TUTORIAL HAS 2 COMMENTS:

## By Guankeyi Chuchu Guanbei on July 2nd, 2024

I'm interested in learning IBM SPSS for accurate data analysis. If I can be connected to someone for guidance

## By Ruben Geert van den Berg on July 3rd, 2024

Hi Guankeyi!

First off, we recently launched a complete SPSS course on Udemy (26 videos).

Alternatively, we offer private online SPSS teaching and consulting at $60,- (USD) per hour (only advance payments via Payoneer).

Kind regards,

Ruben

SPSS tutorials