SPSS One-Way ANOVA tests if the means on a metric variable for three or more populations are all equal.
ANOVA is short for “**An**alysis **o**f **Va**riance. This is a family of statistical procedures for testing whether means for groups of cases and/or variables are equal. “One-Way ANOVA” refers to the simplest scenario, involving one categorical group variable and one metric dependent variable.
The populations are identified in the sample by a categorical variable.

For a very simple explanation of the basic idea, see ANOVA - What Is It?.

## SPSS One-Way ANOVA Example

A farmer wants to know if the weight of parsley plants is influenced by using a fertilizer. He selects 90 plants and randomly divides them into three groups of 30 plants each. He applies a biological fertilizer to the first group, a chemical fertilizer to the second group and no fertilizer at all to the third group. After a month he weighs all plants, resulting in parsley.sav. Can we conclude from these data that fertilizer affects weight? We'll open the data file by running the syntax below.

***1. Set default directory.**

cd 'd:downloaded'. /*or wherever data file is located.

***2. Open data.**

get file 'parsley.sav'.

## 1. Quick Data Check

We first want to get an idea of what our data basically look like. A nice option for the data at hand is a running a histogram of `weight`

for each of the three groups separately. The screenshot below walks you through doing so.

Following these steps results in the syntax below. We'll run it and have a quick look at the figures we'll obtain.

*** Run split histograms.**

GRAPH

/HISTOGRAM=weight

/PANEL COLVAR=fertilizer COLOP=CROSS.

We don't see any very large or very small weights. The shapes of the frequency distributions are unremarkable. Since we don't see anything unexpected in the data, we can proceed our analysis with confidence.

## 2. Assumptions One-Way ANOVA

Results from statistical procedures can only be taken seriously insofar as relevant assumptions are met. For a One-Way ANOVA, these are

- independent and identically distributed variables (or, less precisely, “independent observations”);
- homoscedasticity: the dependent variable has the same variance within each population;
- normality: the dependent variable is normally distributed within each population;

The first assumption is beyond the scope of this tutorial. For now, we'll assume it's at least reasonably met.

Homoscedasticity not holding is less serious insofar as the sample sizes are more equal. Since our example data holds three equally sized groups, there's no reason for concern here.

Violation of the normality assumption hardly affects test results for reasonable sample sizes (say, all N > 30). The latter condition roughly holds for our data. On top of that, the histograms we saw earlier looked reasonably normally distributed too. We thus consider this assumption satisfied.

If assumptions 2 and 3 seem seriously violated, consider a Kruskal-Wallis test instead of ANOVA.

## 3. Running SPSS One-Way ANOVA

We'll now run the actual One-Way ANOVA test. The screenshot below walks you through the steps.

Under

Clicking results in the syntax below.

***Run One-Way ANOVA.**

ONEWAY weight BY fertilizer

/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES

/MISSING ANALYSIS.

## 4. SPSS One-Way ANOVA Output

After running the syntax, we'll first inspect the **Descriptives** table.

“N” in the first column refers to the number of cases used for calculating the descriptive statistics. These numbers being equal to our sample sizes tells us that there are no missing values on the dependent variable.

The **mean** weights are the core of our output. After all, our main research question is whether these differ for different fertilizers. On average, parsley plants weigh some 51 grams if no fertilizer was used. Biological fertilizer results in an average weight of some 54 grams whereas chemical fertilizer does best with a mean weight of 57 grams.

Next, we'll focus on the **ANOVA** table.

- The degrees of freedom (**df**) and **F** statistic are not immediately interesting but we'll need them later on for reporting our results correctly.

The p value (denoted by “**Sig.**”) is .028. This means that if the population mean weights are exactly equal, we only have a 2.8% chance of finding the differences that we observe in our sample. The null hypothesis is usually rejected if p < .05 so we conclude that the mean weights of the three groups of plants are not equal. The weights of parsley plants are affected by the fertilizer -if any- that's used.

## 5. Reporting a One-Way ANOVA

First and foremost, we'll report our descriptive statistics. The least we report, are the means, standard deviations and numbers of cases these are based on. Regarding the significance test, we report

- the
**F**value; **df1**, the numerator**d**egrees of**f**reedom;**df2**, the denominator degrees of freedom;- the
**p value**

like so: *“our three fertilizer conditions resulted in different mean weights for the parsley plants, F(2,87) = 3.7, p = .028.”*

## This tutorial has 35 comments

## By Ruben Geert van den Berg on March 18th, 2016

Hi Lucy!

"Percent" literally means "per 100". However, SPSS reports p-values as proportions ("per 1"). So "half" corresponds to a proportion of 0.5 (0.5 per 1) or a percentage of 50% (50 per 100).

As you see, (proportion * 100 = percent) and (percent / 100 = proportion). Therefore a p-value of 0.001 = (0.001 * 100 = ) 0.1% or one in thousand.

## By Lucy Johnstone on March 17th, 2016

Thanks for this! Very helpful.

Just wondering though, on spss if the sig. number for my research is 0.001, is that 0.01% or 0.001% significance?

Thanks

## By Ruben Geert van den Berg on March 9th, 2016

Thanks for your comment. Good point.

I wanted to keep things simple at this stage but we'll surely discuss post hoc tests such as Tukey's HSD in later, more advanced tutorials on ANOVA.

## By M.H. on March 9th, 2016

Thank you so much, this was really clear and helpful. I wished you mentioned PostHoc too, where you find which means are different from each other.

Great work!

## By aynes123 on March 6th, 2016

can't thank you enough !!